I.e If i got a progression for a chorus, scaler could suggest new chord progressions that would fit to use as verses and middle eights.
Something like that
I.e If i got a progression for a chorus, scaler could suggest new chord progressions that would fit to use as verses and middle eights.
Something like that
Do you consider it reasonable that Scaler create an arrangement and associated chords with that arrangement when given a small amount chords to work off of?
at least a random ize function could be very handy!
I very much understand your reaction and response, but by way of background and not making any value judgements, there have been quite few posts which apparently seek āone buttonā hit track composition, and @LightWingStudios response was maybe in that context and without malign intent.
This board has been pretty civilised to date with no aggro or trolls.
Exactly my intent. Not to offend but to point that out.
It would seem, IMO and I think many others would agree, that a āOne Button Hit Trackā feature would an unreasonable request of ANY VST/AAX software developer.
But you of course are free to make any āenhancementā request you so desire. If I may suggest that with that request you outline exactly what a āHit Trackā is, the genre, the arrangement, etc. The Scaler SW developers will need parameters and specifications to achieve the results you would be satisfied with. It will be interesting to see if they consider or are up to the challenge.
And what if i where to suggest a one buttonā hit track, again?<
My response was to your āsuggestionā.
Then you deleted your previous posts. Good luck in all your endeavors.
There @ClaudioPorcellana , another idiom for your linguistics collection It is a polite form for something better not said honestly in social forums
I think weāre getting stuck with the wording āHit Trackā. To me, the intent of the feature request is clearā¦ just offer a variety of chord progressions somehow related to the existing one. I do think this is reasonable both in desire as well as in implementation.
One could start with the random suggestions and let the user filter out, that leaves the creative agency with the musician. Or one can derive (via machine learning?) the typical patterns per genre and make according suggestions. Scaler does it with chords already in the Circle of Fifth UI. Thereās some underlying theory that makes suggestions āreasonableā.
Now itās at the Scaler product teamās discretion on when or whether to implement that capability. But it doesnāt warrant shooting down the feature suggestion by those who donāt see a need for it in their perspective. I very much second @jimmyzk 's idea and hope too that Scaler will grow toward that opportunity.
As for the occasional communication mishaps, consider that we are a very diverse (geographic and cultural) community here, and little hiccups occasionally occur. But I can also second the assertion that nobody here as ill will but only good intentions. So chill people
Very interesting yes, added to the list
Anyways pals, please donāt kill my āsegreto di Pulcinellaā to have a Scaler āRick Wakemanā button a day or another
We have made some really interesting progress in this space recently. And suggestion features are coming in 2.5.
I wonāt say too much except that we have a lot of fun testing and even though I am usually not a fan of randomization when you had a bit of theory in the mix it makes Scaler shine
It is recommended to add the selected style, because different styles, bass, melody and rhythm are different.
This will make scaler a necessary software for learning music style.
@Ed1 Any ETA on 2.5?..asking for the Masses.
Next year if I remember well
2.5 will be available around the end of November
@Ed1 YES! 'Tis trueā¦you are THE MAN!
I agree with Bernd on this. The request - though maybe not perfectly phrased - is as āvalidā as any other.